fukushima

This Is Not Chernobyl Part II

  • First Posted: Mar 17 2011 12:34 PM
  • Updated: 39 minutes ago

In 1986, Soviet secrecy was almost as much to blame for the death toll as nuclear fallout.

Many commentators, including Greenpeace’s Shawn-Patrick Stencil in The Mark, have linked the current nuclear crisis in Japan to the 1986 Chernobyl disaster, but today in the Edmonton Journal Chernobyl expert David Marples attempts to illustrate the difference. A major one is that while the world is watching the Fukushima disaster unfold in real time, Soviet officials didn’t even announce anything had happened for 40 hours after a hydrogen explosion demolished Chernobyl’s containment system. “The enormity of Chernobyl as a disaster was greatly compounded by Soviet secrecy, which even 25 years later has resulted in a bitter international dispute as to the current and future death toll,” writes Marples. The mere fact that Japanese officials promptly evacuated the area and accepted international help means that the human cost of the Fukushima crisis is virtually guaranteed to be much lower than Chernobyl’s.

“The world is about to enter a no-fly zone for energy policy,” writes Terence Corcoran in the Financial Post, “a period where … all options appear to be politically off-limits.” Fossil fuels are polluting, wind and solar are unviable for now, hydro is environmentally damaging, and in the wake of Fukushima, nuclear is facing a backlash. “At the end of the battle, the most likely winner will be the energy source that is cheapest, works best and offers the lowest risks. It will be hard to beat the fossil fuels we know and trust.” Corcoran’s playing fast and loose with the terms "we" and “trust” there, the Newsroom would judge.

One thing’s for certain: For the foreseeable future, if someone at a Canadian nuclear power plant so much as spills a cup of coffee, you’re going to read about it in the news.

“It’s safe to predict that another nuclear accident is inevitable,” opines the Globe and Mail’s Margaret Wente. “It’s just a matter of where, and when.” She believes that China, which is building nuclear plants at a rate faster than the rest of the world combined and continues to be plagued by corruption and lax construction standards, is probably the frontrunner to host the world’s next nuclear catastrophe.

Comments

LATEST NEWS

So Long and Thanks for All The Hits

In which we bid adieu and do something t...

MacKay Underestimated Libya Cost by $300 M

Well, at least we won, kinda....

SpaceX Laying Groundwork for Visits to Private Space Stations

No more low-orbit fly-bys for SpaceX –...

Globe and Mail To Hide Behind Paywall

As if they actually expect people to pay...

MCA's Death Puts 7 Beastie Boys Albums on Billboard 200

Only Hello Nasty and To The Five Borough...

Prince Charles Does The Weather, Is Actually Charming

While he might never get to be king, at ...

Greek Unemployment Hits New High

One in four Greeks are unemployed, while...

NDP Outpolling Tories

The NDP is now nipping at the Tories' he...

Details of First Low-Cost 'Artificial Leaf' Published

An MIT chemist has found a way to replic...

National Post Infographic Details Child, Forced Labour Worldwide

Some of the world's hottest economies ...

Rothko, Pollock Help Smash Contemporary Art Auction Record

Nearly $400 million was spent on a haul ...

Only A Quarter of Americans Support Afghanistan War

A new poll shows that support for the de...

play

FEATURED VIDEO

This is apparently what news anchors (at least cool ones) do during commercial breaks.  Reminiscent of the coordinated dance routines our own news editor Mike Barber performs after a few beers.

The Life of a News Anchor: Better Than You Thought

This is apparently what news anchors (at least cool ones) do during commercial breaks. Reminiscent of the coordinated dance routines our own news editor Mike Barber performs after a few beers.