Tripoli shores Libya

Will the EU Win Glory on the Shores of Tripoli?

Description image by Richard Gowan Associate Director, Center on International Cooperation, New York University.
  • First Posted: Mar 07 2011 09:15 AM
  • Updated: about 1 hour ago

The situation in Libya is the EU's problem. Is deploying EU forces to Libya a credible option?

Who will keep the peace in Libya if Gadhafi falls? Western military planners are starting to look at options – mainly involving airpower – for deposing our erstwhile friend in Tripoli. But there are also mounting calls for some sort of international peace operation to stabilize Libya, whether to oversee a negotiated end to Gadhafi’s rule or to help clear up after a violent conclusion to his time in power.

Such a peacekeeping force would require broad-based Libyan and regional consent – not to be confused with a western intervention force tasked with fighting its way to Gadhafi's headquarters, an option the Arab League has rejected. In Tuesday’s International Herald Tribune, former Canadian justice minister Irwin Cotler and Jared Genser, an American academic, called for “the rapid deployment of an African Union-European Union force to the country.” Although they didn’t spell it out, the force would presumably assist in humanitarian relief, secure vulnerable oil installations, and possibly help disarm pro-Gadhafi forces.

Is this a credible option? European politicians and generals are reportedly very jumpy at the thought of deploying to Libya, and would probably ask why Cotler hasn’t called for Canadian troops to deploy to Benghazi and Tripoli under a UN banner. But Cotler and Genser are right: this is the EU’s problem.

European forces should be able to deploy rapidly to Libya, just as they did to Lebanon in 2006 to help end the war between Israel and Hezbollah. The Europeans can utilize NATO bases and assets in the Mediterranean, which are vastly superior to what the UN is usually able to bring to bear at the start of an operation. But an EU-flagged force with a strong humanitarian mandate from the UN would be more politically palatable than a NATO-led intervention. Nobody wants this to look like “Afghanistan II.”

That is one reason that the U.S., while potentially ready to help get other nations’ troops ashore, is unlikely to get into peacekeeping itself, even if the Marines’ Hymn celebrates past glories on “the shores of Tripoli.” In fact, the U.S. might well encourage Europeans to help stabilize Libya as quid pro quo for drawing down in Afghanistan – just as many Europeans sent troops to Lebanon as an alternative to Iraq.

What about mounting the mission in tandem with the African Union? This has attractions in terms of both political legitimacy and price. AU troops cost less than a fifth of EU ones per capita. But the AU has moved more slowly than the EU, UN, and Arab League in censuring Gadhafi and already has heavy military commitments in Somalia (where more troops are required to secure Mogadishu) and Darfur.

The AU is also mired in efforts to resolve the crisis in Côte d’Ivoire, where tensions between the rival governments of Alassane Ouattara and Laurent Gbagbo are increasing, risking full-scale civil war. It might be best for the AU to focus on these crises – as well as supporting the independence of South Sudan – rather than getting deeply involved in Libya. Are there alternative partners for the EU? My colleague Daniel Korski of the European Council on Foreign Relations has argued for a UN-mandated mission led by Arab militaries. It’s possible that countries like Jordan and Morocco could send troops.

Egypt is also a big player in peacekeeping operations – with more than 5,000 troops in blue helmets at the start of the year, it’s the fifth biggest contributor to UN operations. However, many Libyans might worry about an Egyptian deployment turning into a permanent zone of influence as the mission unfolds.

The best option might be for the EU to mount an initial deployment under a UN mandate and then gradually hand off to a UN-commanded force. Similar “green-blue” transitions from non-UN to UN forces (named after the different colours of the forces’ helmets) have taken place in Haiti and Chad.

A surprising number of countries might be willing to join a follow-on UN mission. China, which has taken an increasing role in African peacekeeping in recent years, has major oil interests in Libya. And perhaps Cotler will persuade his fellow Canadians to deploy with the UN on the shores of Tripoli.

TAGS: Politics, Libya

Comments

LATEST NEWS

France Does Away with 'Mademoiselle'

Official documents will now only ask if ...

U.S., U.K. Are Fattest Countries in OECD

But it looks like the number of overweig...

'Waterworld' Discovered 40 Light Years Away

And yes, this giant ball of boiling wate...

Two Journalists Killed in Syrian Shelling

Famed foreign correspondent Marie Colvin...

Yemen Votes out Saleh for His Deputy

Saleh follows Mubarak, Ben Ali, and Gadh...

Dutch Scientist to Create World's First Lab-Grown Burger

Better for your conscience, just as awfu...

Munch's 'The Scream' To Be Auctioned May 2

If you have $80 million and love having ...

U.S. Troops Accidentally Burn Korans in Afghanistan

We're pretty sure that's example 1A of w...

Libya Celebrates Anniversary of Benghazi Uprising

Feb. 17 was the beginning of the end of ...

Authorities Uncover $6 Trillion in Fake U.S. Bonds

Mafia's counterfeiting scheme could be t...

Fruit Flies Get Loaded to Kill Parasites

New research adds further proof that alc...

play

FEATURED VIDEO

This is apparently what news anchors (at least cool ones) do during commercial breaks.  Reminiscent of the coordinated dance routines our own news editor Mike Barber performs after a few beers.

The Life of a News Anchor: Better Than You Thought

This is apparently what news anchors (at least cool ones) do during commercial breaks. Reminiscent of the coordinated dance routines our own news editor Mike Barber performs after a few beers.