crtc

Lovely CRTC Meter Maid

  • First Posted: Feb 02 2011 12:00 PM
  • Updated: about 3 hours ago

Where would internet users be without you?

Writing in the Globe and Mail, Richard French says he's concerned about the Conservatives’ plans to review a decision by the CRTC that allows major internet service providers to compel smaller companies that lease their networks to levy fees on users who exceed pre-set downloading limits. French says the ruling should stand because it rectifies the current arrangement, which compels major telecom companies to lease their networks to independent ISPs at low prices in order to artificially create competition, a regulation that French condemns because it “repeal[s] the laws of property and the principles of economics.” Furthermore, the Conservatives have already overturned two major CRTC decisions, and a third reversal would risk reducing the agency to “to a mere way station for disgruntled interests on the way to cabinet.”

The National Post editorial board supports the CRTC decision, writing today that despite caps the big telecom companies already impose on their own customers, Canadians are still some of the heaviest users of the internet and “users can, if they choose, moderate their Internet usage if they want to pay less.” True, Canadians use the internet a lot, but the Post neglects to mention we also pay more for it than do users in virtually every other country on Earth, a disparity the CRTC decision will only exacerbate.

As the importance of the internet grows, the CRTC decision will unduly restrict internet usage, according to this Toronto Star editorial. “The problem is that internet use is changing fast,” says the Star. “More and more businesses are using advanced online applications and websites with rich video content – but find that they or their customers are bumping into the monthly limits … If they go over they can find themselves paying $2 or more for every extra gigabyte of data – something that costs the providers as little as a penny.”

Rightly or wrongly, it’s that $2-to-one-penny figure that this debate boils down to for most Canadians. Sure the big telecom companies have infrastructure costs to recoup, but making a 2000 per cent profit per gigabyte? That does not compute.

Comments

LATEST NEWS

So Long and Thanks for All The Hits

In which we bid adieu and do something t...

MacKay Underestimated Libya Cost by $300 M

Well, at least we won, kinda....

SpaceX Laying Groundwork for Visits to Private Space Stations

No more low-orbit fly-bys for SpaceX –...

Globe and Mail To Hide Behind Paywall

As if they actually expect people to pay...

MCA's Death Puts 7 Beastie Boys Albums on Billboard 200

Only Hello Nasty and To The Five Borough...

Prince Charles Does The Weather, Is Actually Charming

While he might never get to be king, at ...

Greek Unemployment Hits New High

One in four Greeks are unemployed, while...

NDP Outpolling Tories

The NDP is now nipping at the Tories' he...

Details of First Low-Cost 'Artificial Leaf' Published

An MIT chemist has found a way to replic...

National Post Infographic Details Child, Forced Labour Worldwide

Some of the world's hottest economies ...

Rothko, Pollock Help Smash Contemporary Art Auction Record

Nearly $400 million was spent on a haul ...

Only A Quarter of Americans Support Afghanistan War

A new poll shows that support for the de...

play

FEATURED VIDEO

This is apparently what news anchors (at least cool ones) do during commercial breaks.  Reminiscent of the coordinated dance routines our own news editor Mike Barber performs after a few beers.

The Life of a News Anchor: Better Than You Thought

This is apparently what news anchors (at least cool ones) do during commercial breaks. Reminiscent of the coordinated dance routines our own news editor Mike Barber performs after a few beers.