social media

Show Us the Money, Not the Tweets

  • First Posted: Jan 26 2011 16:47 PM
  • Updated: 29 minutes ago

Are attack ads worth our attention if nobody paid good money to get them on the air?

The Montreal Gazette’s L. Ian MacDonald deplores the way that social media has debased political discourse by compelling politicians and journalists to engage in endless tweeting and Facebooking. “At a certain point, it isn't even about the story anymore; it's about feeding the Beast,” he writes. Case in point are the ads released online by the Liberals and Conservatives earlier this month. They aren’t worth the coverage they’ve received, according to MacDonald. “A flight of negative and response ads is not news unless there's a serious media buy behind it,” he argues. We in The Mark Newsroom are divided on this point. True, it’s a journalistic rule of thumb that unless politicians are throwing a lot of money behind a media campaign, it’s just public bickering. But on the other hand, isn’t the genie out of the bottle on this one? Surely an age social media is helping topple governments, anyone who privileges expensive but antiquated media like TV over Twitter is hiding their head in the sand.

Responding to recent controversies over the use Twitter to cover trials like the Russell Williams case, an Ottawa Citizen editorial makes the case for drafting guidelines to allow social media in the courtroom. The idea is that because a crime is breach of the community’s laws, the community has a right to be in the courtroom, if not physically then at least in the form of an unfettered media. “Lawyers and judges can and should express specific concerns about the impact of new media on victims, witnesses, juries and accused,” says the Citizen. “But they should also acknowledge the enormous value of letting citizens … peek into the nation's courtrooms.” The idea that details heinous crimes like rape and murder will be reduced to 140 characters and fed to the public is, to us in the Newsroom, a little disturbing, and we’re not convinced by the Citizen’s argument that collectively, streams of tweets provide appropriate context. But our grandchildren will probably find it strange that we ever typed out full sentences, so again, the genie has fled the decanter, and we better agree to some rules to govern courtroom tweets.

Comments

LATEST NEWS

So Long and Thanks for All The Hits

In which we bid adieu and do something t...

MacKay Underestimated Libya Cost by $300 M

Well, at least we won, kinda....

SpaceX Laying Groundwork for Visits to Private Space Stations

No more low-orbit fly-bys for SpaceX –...

Globe and Mail To Hide Behind Paywall

As if they actually expect people to pay...

MCA's Death Puts 7 Beastie Boys Albums on Billboard 200

Only Hello Nasty and To The Five Borough...

Prince Charles Does The Weather, Is Actually Charming

While he might never get to be king, at ...

Greek Unemployment Hits New High

One in four Greeks are unemployed, while...

NDP Outpolling Tories

The NDP is now nipping at the Tories' he...

Details of First Low-Cost 'Artificial Leaf' Published

An MIT chemist has found a way to replic...

National Post Infographic Details Child, Forced Labour Worldwide

Some of the world's hottest economies ...

Rothko, Pollock Help Smash Contemporary Art Auction Record

Nearly $400 million was spent on a haul ...

Only A Quarter of Americans Support Afghanistan War

A new poll shows that support for the de...

play

FEATURED VIDEO

This is apparently what news anchors (at least cool ones) do during commercial breaks.  Reminiscent of the coordinated dance routines our own news editor Mike Barber performs after a few beers.

The Life of a News Anchor: Better Than You Thought

This is apparently what news anchors (at least cool ones) do during commercial breaks. Reminiscent of the coordinated dance routines our own news editor Mike Barber performs after a few beers.