border

Move Over Puerto Rico, There's a New 51st State in Town

  • First Posted: Dec 13 2010 16:26 PM
  • Updated: 3 minutes ago

It's bigger than Texas, colder than Alaska, and more polite than Massachusetts. And if plans to integrate U.S. and Canadian border security go ahead, it could be here sooner rather than later.

There are plans afoot to integrate U.S. and Canadian border control and create a giant North American perimeter encompassing both countries. In theory this is a good idea, says the Globe and Mail. The “thickening” of the border post-9-11 has resulted in the strangulation of U.S.-Canada trade, and there “would be no need to tighten the border if U.S. lawmakers could be assured that terrorists planning to slip into the U.S. via Canada could be stopped.” The Globe might be right, but does Washington need direct control over Canada’s borders to make sure no terrorists are slipping into the U.S. from here? Perhaps we could just remind them that we’ve already done a good job preventing that kind of thing?

The Montreal Gazette is skeptical about the plan, arguing that Canada has already harmonized our domestic security and travel policies to fit U.S. standards, and our trade has still been strangled. There is “little reason to think the U.S. will be anything less than its by-now usual paranoid self” under a North America-wide security agreement, the Gazette says. One could argue that in post-9-11 world the U.S. has every reason to be extremely vigilant, but the Gazette points to the recent case of Pakistani-born Canadian Javed Latif, who was put on a U.S. watchlist in 2003 and then removed from it two years later. Washington gave no reason for either decision.

The Toronto Star’s Thomas Walkom says a North American perimeter is horrible idea, because not only would it mean allowing U.S. security forces — the guys behind Maher Arar’s deportation and Guantanamo Bay — to collect information on us, but we’d be tying ourselves closer to an economy that increasingly appears to be crumbling. Worst of all, Walkom says, we wouldn’t end up with the hassle-free border we covet because “no U.S. politician who wants to get re-elected would ever agree to weakening America’s northern border … So the upshot of any perimeter deal will be to give the U.S two borders — an outer one around North America and an inner one at the 49th parallel.” Hello, 51st state!

Comments

LATEST NEWS

So Long and Thanks for All The Hits

In which we bid adieu and do something t...

MacKay Underestimated Libya Cost by $300 M

Well, at least we won, kinda....

SpaceX Laying Groundwork for Visits to Private Space Stations

No more low-orbit fly-bys for SpaceX –...

Globe and Mail To Hide Behind Paywall

As if they actually expect people to pay...

MCA's Death Puts 7 Beastie Boys Albums on Billboard 200

Only Hello Nasty and To The Five Borough...

Prince Charles Does The Weather, Is Actually Charming

While he might never get to be king, at ...

Greek Unemployment Hits New High

One in four Greeks are unemployed, while...

NDP Outpolling Tories

The NDP is now nipping at the Tories' he...

Details of First Low-Cost 'Artificial Leaf' Published

An MIT chemist has found a way to replic...

National Post Infographic Details Child, Forced Labour Worldwide

Some of the world's hottest economies ...

Rothko, Pollock Help Smash Contemporary Art Auction Record

Nearly $400 million was spent on a haul ...

Only A Quarter of Americans Support Afghanistan War

A new poll shows that support for the de...

play

FEATURED VIDEO

This is apparently what news anchors (at least cool ones) do during commercial breaks.  Reminiscent of the coordinated dance routines our own news editor Mike Barber performs after a few beers.

The Life of a News Anchor: Better Than You Thought

This is apparently what news anchors (at least cool ones) do during commercial breaks. Reminiscent of the coordinated dance routines our own news editor Mike Barber performs after a few beers.