maclean's

Maclean's fights back

  • First Posted: Sep 30 2010 13:43 PM
  • Updated: about 2 hours ago

The magazine responds after the House of Commons passes a bill condemning their story on Quebec corruption.

As previously noted in this space, there’s been a lot of anger over the Maclean’s cover story that labeled Quebec “the most corrupt province in Canada.” But perhaps one positive that can be drawn from the uproar is that it’s proof our politicians can still reach a consensus on something. Yesterday the House of Commons took the unusual step of unanimously passing a motion censuring the magazine for smearing Quebec’s reputation.

Maclean’s defended itself yesterday, posting this lengthy reply to the House. “It’s true that we lack a statistical database to prove beyond a shadow of a doubt that Quebec is an outlier among the provinces,” the editors write. “But that does not mean we are required to suspend all judgment in the face of a preponderance of evidence — scandal after scandal at every level of government in the province … It’s worth noting that none of our critics has mounted a credible case that any other province better deserves the title of worst in class.” Critics of the story have said that the article is a veiled attack on the people of Quebec from the Toronto-based magazine. The editors try to clarify their argument, saying corruption “is a political problem, and a reflection on the province’s politicians and its political culture, not a condemnation of the character of the province or its people.” Let’s see if that satisfies anyone.

Sun Media’s Lorrie Goldstein makes the argument that it’s not only Quebec’s politicians who are responsible for creating a culture of corruption in the province. Their colleagues in Ottawa are equally to blame. The real villain here is the sovereignty issue, Goldstein says, because “constantly trying to buy the loyalty of Quebecers by bribing them to stay in Canada corrupts everyone and everything it touches.” The sponsorship scandal (which originated in Ottawa) is a prime example of this, as are “infuriating, pathetic spectacles like eight Conservative MPs donning Nordiques jerseys to show their brainless support for shelling out $175 million of our money for a new hockey arena.”

Comments

LATEST NEWS

So Long and Thanks for All The Hits

In which we bid adieu and do something t...

MacKay Underestimated Libya Cost by $300 M

Well, at least we won, kinda....

SpaceX Laying Groundwork for Visits to Private Space Stations

No more low-orbit fly-bys for SpaceX –...

Globe and Mail To Hide Behind Paywall

As if they actually expect people to pay...

MCA's Death Puts 7 Beastie Boys Albums on Billboard 200

Only Hello Nasty and To The Five Borough...

Prince Charles Does The Weather, Is Actually Charming

While he might never get to be king, at ...

Greek Unemployment Hits New High

One in four Greeks are unemployed, while...

NDP Outpolling Tories

The NDP is now nipping at the Tories' he...

Details of First Low-Cost 'Artificial Leaf' Published

An MIT chemist has found a way to replic...

National Post Infographic Details Child, Forced Labour Worldwide

Some of the world's hottest economies ...

Rothko, Pollock Help Smash Contemporary Art Auction Record

Nearly $400 million was spent on a haul ...

Only A Quarter of Americans Support Afghanistan War

A new poll shows that support for the de...

play

FEATURED VIDEO

This is apparently what news anchors (at least cool ones) do during commercial breaks.  Reminiscent of the coordinated dance routines our own news editor Mike Barber performs after a few beers.

The Life of a News Anchor: Better Than You Thought

This is apparently what news anchors (at least cool ones) do during commercial breaks. Reminiscent of the coordinated dance routines our own news editor Mike Barber performs after a few beers.